Much of this class will be focused on a central skill of both
college and workplace writing: making an argument.
More
immediately, you will be using the skills you learn here for the
rest of the semester -- so it makes sense to devote the time to
mastering them now.
An
argument generally involves three elements:
Element |
Description of Element |
The
Claim |
What you want your readers to believe; the "point" you hope
to persuade your reader of
|
The
Evidence |
What you will use to support the claim; your "proof" -- often
a direct or indirect quotation from a text, but sometimes
a statistic or the like
|
The
Warrant |
A general principle that explains why you think your evidence
is relevant to your claim
|
You
might want to think of making a point with evidence in a paper
as a conversation with a friend in which you attempt to persuade
that friend of a particular perspective.
Listed below are the questions your friend might ask as you tried
to make your argument, followed by the element described above
that would answer your friend's questions:
Question from Friend |
Element |
What
are you trying to demonstrate?
|
The
Claim |
What
proof do you have?
|
The
Evidence |
Why
do you think that your proof is relevant to your claim?
|
The
Warrant |
You
must always state both your claim and
your supporting evidence explicitly;
one without the other is either pointless evidence or an ungrounded
opinion.
Taking
a fairly straightforward example:
I
know it rained last night because the streets are wet. |
Element |
Text |
The
Claim
What
are you trying to demonstrate?
|
I know it rained last night |
The
Evidence
What
proof do you have?
|
the streets are wet
|
It
would be difficult to take issue with this claim-evidence relationship.
But
most evidence-claim relationships are not so simple.
Most evidence-claim relationships require an additional element: a warrant.
(click
here continue on to next page and the discussion of the warrant--->)